• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Teague Hopkins

Mindful Product Management

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Blog

Jul 11 2012

Nonprofits Are Harder

Nonprofit startups face all the challenges nonprofits face, plus all the challenges of for-profit startups. The compounded nature makes it more difficult, not less, to start a successful, lean, and sustainable nonprofit compared to a similar for-profit. One of the key pieces that nonprofit founders frequently forget is that not making a profit doesn’t mean you can ignore the revenue side of the equation. You still need to raise enough money to pay for the services you provide (and to fuel growth), whether that is through donation-based fundraising, corporate partnerships, grants, or a fee-for-service model (or some combination of several of these options).

With a for-profit model, when you convince someone to pay money for your product or service, you have also convinced them that you are providing them value equal to or greater than the cost. You have succeeded in creating value, and identifying a revenue stream.

Donation Box by Katherine Harper

In the nonprofit world, value is often provided to one party, while another party pays for it. With few exceptions, beneficiaries are not customers. Of course, donors also receive some value in this transaction, but it’s an indirect value proposition. If you’re starting a nonprofit startup, you need to find a way to create value, convince one party to be the recipient (not always as easy as it sounds), and another to pay for it. Further, sophisticated funders demand proof that the actions your organization takes are, indeed, providing the promised value, so you must measure the results of your value creation and compare them to other methods of value creation to ensure that you’re being as effective as possible.

Have you started a nonprofit organization? We’d love to hear your story.

Written by Teague Hopkins · Categorized: Main · Tagged: Customer, Fundraising, Lean, Nonprofit organization, Nonprofits

Jun 29 2012

Job Descriptions That Don’t Suck

Most job descriptions are terrible – so are most resumes – but they don’t have to be. Startups, or people hiring for a new job, often have to write job descriptions before they have complete clarity about the position, and perhaps even before they have a lot of experience hiring. If you’re writing your own job description, here are some things you can do to make it better.

Include the best AND worst parts of your job.
You’re looking for a good fit. Leaving out the parts of the job that are turnoffs will just get you more applications from people who are going to leave once they realize that the job wasn’t what they expected.

Photo by Stéfan

Describe what a day might be like.
Telling potential job seekers what they might do over the course of a day or a week in this job is a great way to help them envision what it would be like to work for you, and for them to imagine whether it’s a good fit.

Show a personality, not just a list of attribute checkboxes (requirements).
Anyone can play “match the attribute checkboxes.” If you want applicants who are a good cultural fit, you have to give some clues about your culture. Telling people what you value is only marginally valuable; showing them by example is a much more effective way to attract like-minded people. Humor and tone are useful tools here.

Consider hiring someone part-time or on contract.
For some situations, doing projects with applicants before hiring them full-time can help you see if they have the skills you need, and if they work well with your team, much better than an interview or resume. Just be aware that there is a limit to how much of a commitment you can ask applicants to make before you’ve made a commitment to them.

If you liked this article, you might like CultureCamp, the unconference on creating company culture.

[button color=”orange” link=http://culturecamp.teaguehopkins.com]Find Out More[/button]

Written by Teague Hopkins · Categorized: Main · Tagged: Culture, Human–machine interaction, Unconference

Apr 10 2012

Lean is not Skeletal

Lean does not mean bare bones. It does not mean minimize expenses at any cost. It does not prohibit raising money.

In biology, lean refers to the proportion of muscle to excess fat. In business, lean means getting more value for fewer resources.

Reduce waste. Be lean, not skeletal. Don’t cut the muscle.

It’s about efficiency. And sometimes being efficient actually means scaling up and using more resources. Elite athletes eat more than the rest of us. Michael Phelps needed to consume 12,000 calories a day during the Beijing Olympics.

Efficiency = Value Produced/Resources Used

Too often, I hear people talking about how they are being lean by limiting their resource consumption, instead of putting those resources behind the right purpose.
It can be tempting to focus on the resources part of the equation, and eliminate all sorts of things just because we can. The problem lies in forgoing activities that actually create value. Just because something is expensive, doesn’t mean it’s wrong. Don’t stop doing things, just stop doing the wrong things.

What are the wrong things? Anything that doesn’t contribute to creating incremental value. Value should not be confused with cash, unless the sole purpose of your organization is to produce cash. Most organizations define value differently depending on their industry.

Industry Increments of Value
Manufacturing high-quality physical goods
Software development working code in the final product
Startup validated learning
Nonprofit social or environmental change

 
Lean startups don’t have to be bootstrapped. They can raise funding. They just need to be deliberate and focused about how they spend the money they raise.

Written by Teague Hopkins · Categorized: Main · Tagged: Business, Entrepreneurship, Lean, Lean Startup

Mar 30 2012

A Few Words of Advice for Lean Mentors

This past weekend, I once again had the pleasure of mentoring at Lean Startup Machine DC (#lsmdc). It’s always a great experience to be around so many people who are passionately involved in understanding and solving problems and changing the world. Over the course of the weekend, I spent more than 24 hours mentoring teams, and afterwards, I talked with many of the participants about the mentoring process, what was helpful, and what they wished had gone differently. Here are the primary things I learned.

Velocity

Early on in the weekend it almost doesn’t matter what you do as much as it does the act of doing it. It is important for teams to get through their first Build-Measure-Learn loop quickly to get them over their fear of making the wrong decision and help them realize that they can pivot quickly. Encourage teams to get in front of customers early, even if their first experiment isn’t fully thought-out.

Start with the Problem, Not the Solution

Watch out for teams that dive right into designing their product. They often seem to be making lots of process and will tell you so if you drop by, but they are usually spinning their wheels, and need a kick to get out of the building.

Don’t Plan. Act.

When you’re building anything from scratch, it’s easy to get ahead of yourself. Remind teams not to worry about where the business is going to be in two years. Tell them to figure out the first step and then do it.

Be a Scalpel, Not a Firehose

To borrow from Dan Pink, “Your goal isn’t to demonstrate how much you know or to catalog your many insights, but to leave the audience with one idea to ponder — or better, one step to take.” These teams are surrounded by a myriad of information and it’s a challenge to take it all in. As a mentor, part of your job is to help them pinpoint the right information for the challenge that is immediately in front of them. One participant at #lsmdc explained, “The one thing I felt that all the mentors could do better is provide coaching on action steps. As in, ‘This is what you should do, and here’s how to do it'”.

Deliberation

Lean Startup Machine is a fast-paced weekend. Thinking over some decisions can be valuable, but many decisions don’t need hours of discussion and analysis. Make reversible decisions quickly. Timebox. Don’t wait. In one case, a team had set their minimum success criteria and the early data already showed they weren’t going to hit it. Their feedback: “Your suggestion to pivot immediately rather than continue waiting for survey results saved a great deal of time and frustration.”

Focus on Currency

As anyone who runs a business knows, cash is king. Other forms of currency are equivalent to some discounted value of cash. Letters of intent, email addresses, and people willing to give you the time of day are valuable to varying degrees, in many cases proportional to the amount of friction in the collection process (if all they had to do was click a button, that’s cheap; if they had to jump through some hoops and still bought in, you’re doing better). Remind teams that currency is crucial for validation. One participant said “the most impactful thing you did was to keep asking “Is anyone paying you yet?” — That helped keep me on track.”

 

Have your participated or mentored at an LSM event? What have you found worked well, or needed improvement? Add your thoughts in the comments below.

Written by Teague Hopkins · Categorized: Main · Tagged: Business, Experiment, Lean, Lean Startup, Mentorship

Feb 01 2012

Startup Risk and the Ego

Usually when we talk about risk at a lean startup event, it goes something like this:

Slackline by Remy Saglier - DOUBLERAY

There are two types of risk: market risk and technological risk.
Agile methodologies are used to reduce technological risk, and lean startup (and customer development) helps reduce market risk.

The discussion continues when someone adds:

Web startups don’t really have technological risk. We know we can build it. We don’t know if anyone wants it.
Biotech companies typically have tech risk, but no market risk. Everyone wants a cure for cancer, but we don’t know how to build it (yet).

But I found myself in the middle of a very interesting conversation at last week’s DC Lean Startup Circle. We were talking about a third type of risk that is critical for startups, what Ben Willman calls “ego risk.”

From what I’ve seen, the vast majority of people working in startups have a tendency to want our work to be as good as possible before we show it to people. This instinct runs counter to the concept of a Minimum Viable Product.

We all get attached to our clever solutions, sometimes even after we’ve discovered that they solve the wrong problem (or no problem at all). Ego is why we get attached to our solutions and stop questioning, and why we want to avoid customers until it’s perfect. It’s why we conflate our sense of self-worth with the success of our product or startup.

Ben Horowitz (of Andreessen Horowitz) has written that the most difficult skill for CEOs is to manage their own psychology. He also points out that it’s almost taboo to talk about personal psychology. It’s too easy for founders or CEOs to get in their own way and prevent themselves from executing with objectivity and mindfulness.

We talk about the technical and market risks facing a startup. Why don’t we talk about this more important risk? We need to acknowledge and address ego risk.

Startups have tech risk (can we build it?), market risk (will they buy it?), and ego risk (can I get out of my own way?).

If you want to join the conversation, come check out Ben Willman’s presentation on the subject at the next DC Lean Startup Circle.

Written by Teague Hopkins · Categorized: Main · Tagged: Agile, Business, Customer Development, ego risk, Entrepreneurship, Lean, Lean Startup, Risk

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Copyright © 2025 Teague Hopkins
 

Loading Comments...